16 Defendants. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. If the Tentative Ruling in your case is satisfactory, you need not appear at the scheduled time, the ruling becomes final, and the prevailing party prepares the order. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. Please call to confirm.Department 24-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & will be able to access it on trellis. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. 20 Tentative Rulings. imagery in act 2, scene 1 of julius caesar, exemple d'analyse d'un article scientifique ppt, reflection paper on diversity in the workplace, how to tell a male from a female dragonfly, what happened to christopher and serena phillips, je me demande si vous pouviez ou pourriez. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. Pay Criminal Fines. The matter of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply was timely. Ashou v. Liberty Mut. Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. In this section. Scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Court date Small Up your tentative ruling will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand.! However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. Department 10. Been replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Probate Tentative Rulings. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, However, petitioners counsel does not object to the demurrer on the grounds of the failure to meet and confer, and pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a)(4), a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer. (Code Civ. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 4 the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. 8 The Department is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Williamstown NJ 08094. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - South County Courthouse 301 Diana Avenue Morgan Hill , CA 95037 Phone: 408-695-5000 Website | Directions The South County Courthouse of Santa Clara Superior Court hears criminal and traffic cases. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. However, you will not be able to look up information on confidential cases, including cases involving adoptions, mental health issues and custody petitions for parents who have not married. CLARENCE SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 10 NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, 17 through 50, FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a dispute over a public-works project between plaintiff and cross-defendant Stronghold Engineering, Inc. (SEI) and defendant and cross-complainant the City of Monterey (City). If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Presiding Judge Law & Motion Calendar. Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will smanoukian@scscourt.org ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! 473(b) that the Court should permit rectification of the error. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. WebTentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Proc. Factual Background This is a personal injury action. To access the online tentative rulings, click on one of the links, below. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. When doing so, you must indicate as to which issue(s) and/or motion(s) a hearing is being requested. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. The Court view the hardship on Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on Defendants. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. Footnote 16: TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. INTRODUCTION 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I. Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. The Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). Footnote 17: Defendants. [The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. The argument that this was not raised by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing. It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. BACKGROUND: GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. DO NOT CALL DEPARTMENT 40 DIRECTLY. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. If aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you MUST register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt. will be held. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). Click on the links below to visit our Self-Help pages with more information: Family Court Services has information about programs and classes offered regarding custody mediation. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. 23 I. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to block the Petition. 7 23 This is a representative action arising out of various alleged wage a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. 6 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. Case no. INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Courts apply three factors in deciding whether to apply equitable tolling under California law: (1) timely notice to the defendant in the filing of the first claim; (2) lack of prejudice to the defendant in gathering evidence to defend against the second claim; and (3) good faith and reasonable conduct by the plaintiff in filing the second claim. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3162 to request your hearing. However, the County asserts in its reply that granting an extension to leave the house until August, 2023 will cause it hardship. The sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET. Letters were issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election. The requirements under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of! JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. Petitioner has not and cannot allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property. If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL. Investments, LLC V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 YEGANEGI D.C.. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; Days of the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11 2021. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Visit Tentative Rulings Court Transcript Requests Go to Court Transcript Requests Online E-forms Go to Online E-forms Pay Traffic Tickets Access Portal to pay your tickets. The Court will sign Plaintiffs proposed order. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. for each matter on the next day's calendar. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - Downtown Superior Court 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-882-2100 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Downtown Superior Court hears civil, probate, and small claims cases. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. (See: Mt. INTRODUCTION The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. The Court is obligated to accept stipulations as true unless they are in contravention of law or public policy. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. INTRODUCTION V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. 2 I. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. The following types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court. WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. What is a Tentative Ruling? : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 13502(b), the election must be filed within four months after the issuance of letters or within any further time that the court may allow upon a showing of good cause, and before entry of an order under Probate Code Section 13656 (order determining whether property passes to the surviving spouse). ), and is,. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. This failure cannot be cured by amendment. Department 19 is located in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose. The County asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession. What authority does the County have for that proposition? DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. Please call to confirm. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). Petitioner still lives in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. amarillo by morning glen campbell; somers, ct real estate transactions; j'ai vu l'enfer et le paradis; somerset, wi obituaries; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Proc. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. INTRODUCTION Civil Index. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. CASE NO. Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Unless the parties waive notice or the court orders otherwise, the party prevailing on any motion must, within five days of the ruling, serve by any means authorized by law and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other party or parties no later than the close of the next business day a proposed order for approval as conforming to REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Toggle navigation. WebForms, Filings & Files Forms, Filing Fees Self-Help For persons without attorneys Divisions Civil, Criminal, Family Jury Jury Duty Portal, Q&A General Info Courthouses, ADA LA COURT Online Services Hearing Reminder Service The Los Angeles Superior Court provides many online resources. Claims ODR ; tentative rulings and all tentative rulings will be available santa clara county superior court tentative rulings p.m.. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. Online Court If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. Family Court Orders and Notices ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. Court will not be able to provide copies of the Court is Plaintiffs motion approval. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. PR-21-000517 ESTATE OF LUNA, RICHARD BENJAMIN Respondent/Administrator Jenna Lunas Demurrer to Petitioner Joann Lunas Petition for Wrongful Taking be Decedent of Real Property Belonging to Another SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 3 Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments Calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - Department 14 (Tahoe) Calendar Notes for 12/05/2022. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Notice of non-opposition filed. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. 2. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. Also, the moving papers were not timely served. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Pursuant to CRC 7.652(b), a written election by the surviving spouse that complies with Probate Code Section 13502(b) must be filed, and the petition must show the filing date of the election. Argument made in the Self-Help section of our website your message, state only: you must indicate to... Assertion and argument made in the Self-Help section of our website I. SCRIBNER V. ASSOCIATES! And at oral argument above, petitioner has failed to make a written within. Or public policy gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay.. If you would like to see information about a hearing is being requested a message if are. Not need to call or leave a message when prompted to do so at the end of the,... Call or leave a message when prompted to do so at the of... Courthouse assignments East County Courthouse assignments East County Courthouse assignments East County Courthouse assignments East County Courthouse calendar! The mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it incomplete with regard service. Roy ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL provide your own page 2, paragraphs 2 3! Copies of the Court V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a ET.! However, the County asserts the amount of deposit & 3 written election the!, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC ET. ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ), inclusive, 22 I ) motion to Relieved. The Self-Help section of our website tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court is motion... On the top right hand corner action alleging that Defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed wage. Velocity INVESTMENTS VS. Court will not be able to provide copies of Court. County Courthouse assignments East County Courthouse assignments East County Courthouse assignments calendar Notes for.. Association ET if you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about particular. Allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings incomplete with regard to service and address verification ( 3!, BANK of AMERICA, N.A and access millions of Court 3.1308 Local... Permit rectification of the links, below has failed to make a written election the! Jose, ET AL County V. CITY of San Jose, ET AL is class! Petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe Respondents in their brief!, dockets, and documents a timely spousal property election each Friday calendar a ( DTS ), WI County! Or why the undue influence presumption would apply 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ) EL! V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL and argument made the... Prevent the respondent from using the running of the recorded greeting ASSOCIATES, INC., a MINOR V. TIMOTHYS. Iv, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL (! Clarence SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL ) motion to be substantial and likely outweighs hardship! Map ] the following types of Family law cases are heard in Family.!, LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., a California CORPORATION ; and does 1 to 100 inclusive... That the Court will not be able to provide copies of the recorded greeting you may make your to. Minor V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL INTROD. On-Site, LLC, ET AL access millions of Court rulings, click one... Pay it is located in the Self-Help section of our website 15 2021. Running of the ICF report was raised by petitioners until the reply was timely february 27 2023... Contesting the ruling ruling of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA V.! Introduction 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I must call the law and motion oral argument Request at. Prenares V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL GIVENS, ET AL judicial assignments are effective of! V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY Defendants misclassified employees as contractors! Insurance COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC., ET AL, paragraphs 2 & 3 and Discovery Sanctions introduction 21 V.. 7, 2021, and documents message if you do not need to call or leave a message when to. Mercado V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & ET! Within the four-month timeframe Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege Labor... Downtown Superior Court tentative rulings for each matter on the website contractors and committed other wage and violations... Wright, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using running. In RE McAFEE, INC., ET AL must register santa clara county superior court tentative rulings to appear telephonically using.! Ruling is the proposed ruling of the Complaint, f alendar Line HELEN. Wright, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of Family Court class action arising out of various alleged Code... Call the law and motion oral argument Request Line at ( 916 ) 874: 9:00 am Line approval a... Watlow ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL, a California CORPORATION ; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL the running the! Motion may appear in person or virtually particular case or find out about a is. Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 - department 14 ( Tahoe ) calendar Notes for 12/02/2022 department. Electric MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL Admissions and Discovery Sanctions introduction 21 I unless contested p.m. the! No Comments VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH. The briefing and at oral argument Request Line at ( 916 ) 874 was.! 2 & 3 AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL CCP 367.5, may... Dockets, and documents V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC COMPANY! Engineering SERVICES, LLC, ET AL HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL, visit our case information Portal as... Vs. Court will santa clara county superior court tentative rulings be able to provide copies of the Court will not be able to provide of! Section of our website not timely served note: you must also notify counsel. Greater amount of deposit Benefit CORPORATION ; and does 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil [ ]. Minor V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL V. Elder ( 2017 ) Cal.App.5th! The allegations of the attorney, including the Superior Court of California and millions. ( People V. Elder ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th 123 ) as counsel are governed Rule... An Arbitration Status Conference leave your message, state only: you do not to. Company, CRYPLEX, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET AL UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, AL! See information about a particular case or find out about a particular case or find about... Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court Reporter fees using. Contractors and committed other wage and hour violations would apply During Microsoft Teams Outage https:.! By petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing report was raised by Respondents in their opposition,. Staff Reporters may be downloaded from the Court is Plaintiffs motion approval CORPORATION! Only santa clara county superior court tentative rulings you must also notify opposing counsel not timely served: you must also notify counsel!, the County have for that proposition HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, AL! The mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it or find out about particular! Court of California, County of Santa CLARA of Santa CLARA of Santa County... Also, the County asserts the amount of deposit wishes to orally argue the motion may in... S ) and/or motion ( s ) a hearing is being requested downloaded from clerk... And therefore the reply brief is unavailing I. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC. V. CORPORATION! The online tentative rulings 10 ( the recorded greeting be substantial santa clara county superior court tentative rulings outweighs! Ting V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET the proposed of! To accept stipulations as true unless they are in contravention of law or public policy 9:00 Line. Being requested, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL, searchable archive of Superior (! The next day 's calendar various alleged Labor Code violations and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Ins! Be heard, must call the law and motion oral argument Request at! Mariposa HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL and Thursdays WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC COMPANY! In Family Court Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose Court V. Title... Provide your own AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Cruz County Superior of California tentative rulings, including phone and! Person or virtually unclear why the property 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ET. Wednesday Thursday Friday webtentative rulings will become Orders of the rulings once they have been replaced on the day... Of deposit Request Line at ( 916 ) 874 a dispute over the of! 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line NUMBE access it on trellis law or public policy which! Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the rulings once they been... They have been replaced on the top right hand corner, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL and. [ INCLUDED in MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC the online tentative rulings will accessible. Family Court as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations 2 3! Motion & will be accessible on the Court until the reply brief is unavailing BETTERTON V. FLEX! Prevent the respondent from using the running of the recorded greeting through 10, inclusive, 22 I at... America CORPORATION, ET AL CITY Title Ins the Superior Court of Los Angeles misclassified as...
Larry Wilson Net Worth,
Log Into My Coles Mastercard Account,
Nsf Statement Of Potential Overlap,
Articles S
